Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8627336
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Rodriguez v. Gonzales
No. 8627336 · Decided December 21, 2006
No. 8627336·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 21, 2006
Citation
No. 8627336
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions *674 raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Because petitioners’ June 6, 2006 motion to reopen was numerically barred, the Board of Immigration Appeals did not abuse its discretion when it denied the motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (c)(2); Lara-Torres v. Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 968 (9th Cir.2004), amended by 404 F.3d 1105 (9th Cir.2005). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied. All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions *674 raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions *674 raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
03Because petitioners’ June 6, 2006 motion to reopen was numerically barred, the Board of Immigration Appeals did not abuse its discretion when it denied the motion to reopen.
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions *674 raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Rodriguez v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 21, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8627336 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.