Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8627335
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Flores-Otero v. Gonzales
No. 8627335 · Decided December 21, 2006
No. 8627335·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 21, 2006
Citation
No. 8627335
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). The motion to reopen was not filed within 90 days of the Board of Immigration Appeals decision. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(6)(C). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied. All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal and voluntary departure confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) and Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
03The motion to reopen was not filed within 90 days of the Board of Immigration Appeals decision.
04The temporary stay of removal and voluntary departure confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) and Desta v.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Flores-Otero v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 21, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8627335 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.