Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8627337
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Anaya-Alvares v. Gonzales
No. 8627337 · Decided December 21, 2006
No. 8627337·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 21, 2006
Citation
No. 8627337
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam). Petitioner does not challenge the finding that he lacked a qualifying relative in order to be statutorily eligible for cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(D); Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft, 277 F.3d 1137, 1145 (9th Cir.2002). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied. All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal and voluntary departure confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) and Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
02Petitioner does not challenge the finding that he lacked a qualifying relative in order to be statutorily eligible for cancellation of removal.
03The temporary stay of removal and voluntary departure confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) and Desta v.
04Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Anaya-Alvares v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 21, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8627337 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.