FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 7223049
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Wills v. Brazzel

No. 7223049 · Decided March 20, 2002
No. 7223049 · Ninth Circuit · 2002 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
March 20, 2002
Citation
No. 7223049
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Jim D. Wills, Jr. and Reggie D. Wills appeal pro se the district court’s summary judgment in favor of various employees of the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) and two assistant United States attorneys in the Wills’ civil rights action alleging improper collection of camping fees. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, Delta Sav. Bank v. United States, 265 F.3d 1017 , 1021 (9th Cir.2001), and we affirm. *389 The district court properly granted summary judgment because the Wills failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact as to whether they were entitled to camp on BLM property without paying fees, see 16 U.S.C. § 4601a(b), or as to whether BLM employees acted with racial animus in attempting to collect camping fees, see Vill. of Arlington Heights v. Metro. Hous. Dev. Corp., 429 U.S. 252, 265-66 , 97 S.Ct. 555 , 50 L.Ed.2d 450 (1977). We have considered and rejected the Wills’ contentions regarding conspiracy, excessive force, assault and violation of the Fair Housing Act. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
Wills appeal pro se the district court’s summary judgment in favor of various employees of the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) and two assistant United States attorneys in the Wills’ civil rights action alleging improper collection of cam
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
Wills appeal pro se the district court’s summary judgment in favor of various employees of the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) and two assistant United States attorneys in the Wills’ civil rights action alleging improper collection of cam
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Wills v. Brazzel in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 20, 2002.
Use the citation No. 7223049 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →