Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 7223461
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Allen v. Lamarque
No. 7223461 · Decided March 20, 2002
No. 7223461·Ninth Circuit · 2002·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
March 20, 2002
Citation
No. 7223461
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Michael E. Allen, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing his action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for failure to state a claim. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000), and affirm, see Frost v. Agnos, 152 F.3d 1124 , 1130 (9th Cir.1998); Sanchez v. Vild, 891 F.2d 240, 242 (9th Cir. 1989). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Plain English Summary
Allen, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing his action pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
Key Points
01Allen, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing his action pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
02Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000), and affirm, see Frost v.
03This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
04
Frequently Asked Questions
Allen, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing his action pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Allen v. Lamarque in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 20, 2002.
Use the citation No. 7223461 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.