Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8644516
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Westine v. United States Probation Department
No. 8644516 · Decided October 10, 2007
No. 8644516·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
October 10, 2007
Citation
No. 8644516
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The Clerk shall amend the docket to reflect this status. Appellant John G. Westine, Jr. appeals from the district court’s order denying his request to file a petition for writ of mandamus, dated July 7, 2006, without prepayment of the filing fee. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review the district court’s denial for abuse of discretion, see, e.g., Minetti v. Port of Seattle, 152 F.3d 1113, 1114 (9th Cir.1998), and we vacate and remand. The district court denied appellant’s motion to file without prepayment of the filing fee for three reasons: (1) inadequate showing of indigency; (2) failure to authorize disbursements from prison trust account to pay filing fee; and (3) failure to provide certified copy of trust fund statement for the prior six months, apparently applying the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (a)(2) to the application. However, because appellant’s petition sought to vacate as void ab initio a criminal judgment entered against appellant, the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (a)(2) do not apply. Accordingly, we vacate and remand for the district court to allow appellant to proceed in forma pauperis unless it finds other reasons for the denial. VACATED and REMANDED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.
02appeals from the district court’s order denying his request to file a petition for writ of mandamus, dated July 7, 2006, without prepayment of the filing fee.
03We review the district court’s denial for abuse of discretion, see, e.g., Minetti v.
04Port of Seattle, 152 F.3d 1113, 1114 (9th Cir.1998), and we vacate and remand.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Westine v. United States Probation Department in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on October 10, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8644516 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.