Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8644518
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jackson v. New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc.
No. 8644518 · Decided October 10, 2007
No. 8644518·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
October 10, 2007
Citation
No. 8644518
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
*815 MEMORANDUM ** We have reviewed the responses to the court’s August 28, 2007 order to show cause, the record, and the opening brief. The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant’s motion to reopen. See School Dist. No. 1J Multnomah County, Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1263 (9th Cir.1993). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s order because the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
*815 MEMORANDUM ** We have reviewed the responses to the court’s August 28, 2007 order to show cause, the record, and the opening brief.
Key Points
01*815 MEMORANDUM ** We have reviewed the responses to the court’s August 28, 2007 order to show cause, the record, and the opening brief.
02The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant’s motion to reopen.
03Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s order because the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.