Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8623836
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Vizcaino v. Gonzales
No. 8623836 · Decided August 1, 2006
No. 8623836·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 1, 2006
Citation
No. 8623836
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Arcelia and Enrique Vizcaino, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review *653 of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming without opinion an immigration judge’s decision denying their applications for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review. Petitioners’ contention that the agency violated their due process rights by disregarding hardship evidence is not supported by the record and does not amount to a colorable constitutional claim. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005) (“[traditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute color-able constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”). Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to consider the claim. See id. PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the *653 courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Arcelia and Enrique Vizcaino, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review *653 of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming without opinion an immigration judge’s decision denying their applications for cancell
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Arcelia and Enrique Vizcaino, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review *653 of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming without opinion an immigration judge’s decision denying their applications for cancell
02Petitioners’ contention that the agency violated their due process rights by disregarding hardship evidence is not supported by the record and does not amount to a colorable constitutional claim.
03Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005) (“[traditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute color-able constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”).
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the *653 courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Arcelia and Enrique Vizcaino, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review *653 of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming without opinion an immigration judge’s decision denying their applications for cancell
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Vizcaino v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 1, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8623836 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.