Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8623835
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Vian-Romero v. Gonzales
No. 8623835 · Decided August 1, 2006
No. 8623835·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 1, 2006
Citation
No. 8623835
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Jose Luis Vian-Romero and Alicia Vasquez Vian, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order adopting and affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their applications for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review. We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that petitioners failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship. See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 890 (9th Cir.2003). Petitioners failed to raise questions of law or colorable constitutional claims over which we could exercise jurisdiction. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005) (“traditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute colorable constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Jose Luis Vian-Romero and Alicia Vasquez Vian, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order adopting and affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their applicat
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Jose Luis Vian-Romero and Alicia Vasquez Vian, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order adopting and affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their applicat
02We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary determination that petitioners failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship.
03Petitioners failed to raise questions of law or colorable constitutional claims over which we could exercise jurisdiction.
04Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005) (“traditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute colorable constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”).
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Jose Luis Vian-Romero and Alicia Vasquez Vian, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order adopting and affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their applicat
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Vian-Romero v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 1, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8623835 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.