FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8657300
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Valenzuela v. Mukasey

No. 8657300 · Decided March 25, 2008
No. 8657300 · Ninth Circuit · 2008 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
March 25, 2008
Citation
No. 8657300
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Rosa Valenzuela, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion, Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 592, 601 *635 (9th Cir.2006), and we deny the petition for review. The BIA considered the new evidence regarding Valenzuela’s daughter and acted within its broad discretion in determining that the evidence was insufficient to warrant reopening. See Singh v. INS, 295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir.2002) (The BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen shall be reversed only if it is “arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law.”). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Rosa Valenzuela, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Rosa Valenzuela, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Valenzuela v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 25, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8657300 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →