Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8657354
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Pintor-Pintor v. Mukasey
No. 8657354 · Decided March 25, 2008
No. 8657354·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
March 25, 2008
Citation
No. 8657354
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Balltazar Pintor-Pintor and Leticia Es-quivel-Garcia, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review. The BIA considered the evidence petitioners submitted and acted within its broad discretion in determining that the evidence was insufficient to warrant reopening. See Singh v. INS, 295 F.3d 1037, 1039 (9th Cir.2002) (The BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen shall be reversed only if it is “arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law.”). Petitioners’ contention that the BIA failed adequately to explain its reasons for denying the motion to reopen is not supported by the record. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Balltazar Pintor-Pintor and Leticia Es-quivel-Garcia, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Balltazar Pintor-Pintor and Leticia Es-quivel-Garcia, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings.
02We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Iturribarria v.
03INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.
04The BIA considered the evidence petitioners submitted and acted within its broad discretion in determining that the evidence was insufficient to warrant reopening.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Balltazar Pintor-Pintor and Leticia Es-quivel-Garcia, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Pintor-Pintor v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 25, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8657354 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.