Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10304290
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Wheeler
No. 10304290 · Decided December 24, 2024
No. 10304290·Ninth Circuit · 2024·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
December 24, 2024
Citation
No. 10304290
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 24 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JUAN RODRIGUEZ, No. 24-4309
D.C. No. 6:17-cv-00104-BMM
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. MEMORANDUM*
MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
AND HUMAN SERVICES; THERESA
DIEKHANS; THERESA ADAMS; APRIL
JONES; SAHRITA JONES; HEATHER
SMITH; BRANDI CAMPBELL; BECCI
DELINGER; ALANA KIETZMAN; LISA
ANDERSON MANGAN; TREVOR
LEWIS; ANNA FISHER; JUDY
HARTELIUS; AMANDA HOPE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Montana
Brian M. Morris, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 17, 2024**
Before: WALLACE, GRABER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Juan Rodriguez appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his
motion for a preliminary injunction in his action under the Indian Child Welfare
Act, 25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1).
We review for an abuse of discretion. Am. Trucking Ass’ns, Inc. v. City of Los
Angeles, 559 F.3d 1046, 1052 (9th Cir. 2009). We affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Rodriguez’s motion
for a preliminary injunction because Rodriguez failed to establish the requirements
for such relief. See id. (plaintiff seeking preliminary injunction must establish that
he is likely to succeed on the merits, he is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the
absence of preliminary relief, the balance of equities tips in his favor, and an
injunction is in the public interest). We express no opinion as to the merits of the
claims pending in the district court.
We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued
in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).
AFFIRMED.
2 24-4309
Plain English Summary
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 24 2024 MOLLY C.
Key Points
01NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 24 2024 MOLLY C.
02MEMORANDUM* MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; THERESA DIEKHANS; THERESA ADAMS; APRIL JONES; SAHRITA JONES; HEATHER SMITH; BRANDI CAMPBELL; BECCI DELINGER; ALANA KIETZMAN; LISA ANDERSON MANGAN; TREVOR LEWIS; ANNA FISHER; JUDY
03Morris, District Judge, Presiding Submitted December 17, 2024** Before: WALLACE, GRABER, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
04* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Frequently Asked Questions
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 24 2024 MOLLY C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Wheeler in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on December 24, 2024.
Use the citation No. 10304290 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.