Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8700955
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Walter
No. 8700955 · Decided February 16, 2018
No. 8700955·Ninth Circuit · 2018·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
February 16, 2018
Citation
No. 8700955
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Abram Paul Walter appeals from the district court’s order granting authorization for funds to be paid from his inmate trust account toward his restitution obligation, the court’s denial of his motion for reconsideration of that order, and the court’s amended judgment establishing a restitution payment schedule. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Walter’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Walter the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Abram Paul Walter appeals from the district court’s order granting authorization for funds to be paid from his inmate trust account toward his restitution obligation, the court’s denial of his motion for reconsideration of tha
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Abram Paul Walter appeals from the district court’s order granting authorization for funds to be paid from his inmate trust account toward his restitution obligation, the court’s denial of his motion for reconsideration of tha
021396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Walter’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.
03We have provided Walter the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief.
04No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Abram Paul Walter appeals from the district court’s order granting authorization for funds to be paid from his inmate trust account toward his restitution obligation, the court’s denial of his motion for reconsideration of tha
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Walter in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on February 16, 2018.
Use the citation No. 8700955 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.