Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 9021931
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Marsh v. J. Alexander's LLC
No. 9021931 · Decided February 16, 2018
No. 9021931·Ninth Circuit · 2018·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
February 16, 2018
Citation
No. 9021931
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
THOMAS, Chief Judge: *778 Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that these cases be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in these cases shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. Judge Murguia did not participate in the deliberations or vote in these cases.
Plain English Summary
THOMAS, Chief Judge: *778 Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that these cases be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3.
Key Points
01THOMAS, Chief Judge: *778 Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that these cases be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3.
02The three-judge panel disposition in these cases shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
03Judge Murguia did not participate in the deliberations or vote in these cases.
04
Frequently Asked Questions
THOMAS, Chief Judge: *778 Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that these cases be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Marsh v. J. Alexander's LLC in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on February 16, 2018.
Use the citation No. 9021931 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.