FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8624397
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. Rodriguez

No. 8624397 · Decided August 24, 2006
No. 8624397 · Ninth Circuit · 2006 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 24, 2006
Citation
No. 8624397
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Jose Ricardo Rodriguez, Jr. appeals *668 from the 36-month sentence imposed upon revocation of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . As Rodriguez failed to raise his contentions below, we review the district court’s judgment for plain error, see Johnson v. United States, 520 U.S. 461, 466-67 , 117 S.Ct. 1544 , 137 L.Ed.2d 718 (1997), and we affirm. Rodriguez challenges the district court’s imposition of consecutive revocation sentences where the district court had initially imposed concurrent terms of supervised release. This contention is foreclosed by United States v. Jackson, 176 F.3d 1175, 1177-78 (9th Cir.1999) (per curiam) (holding that the district court has discretion to impose consecutive sentences of imprisonment upon revocation of concurrent sentences of supervised release). Rodriguez also contends that the revocation of his supervised release violates Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 , 125 S.Ct. 738 , 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Specifically, he contends that the revocation procedure is unconstitutional because it allows for an additional term of imprisonment not authorized by the jury’s verdict, and because it permits revocation based on judge-found facts established only by a preponderance of the evidence. Rodriguez’s contentions are foreclosed. See United States v. Huerta-Pimental, 445 F.3d 1220, 1224-25 (9th Cir.2006) (holding that the revocation of supervised release and resulting punishment is part of the original sentence and requires no impermissible judicial fact-finding, and that because revocation and the imposition of additional punishment are discretionary, neither violate Booker or the Sixth Amendment). Because Rodriguez’s contentions fail, we need not consider his remedy claims. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
appeals *668 from the 36-month sentence imposed upon revocation of his supervised release.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
appeals *668 from the 36-month sentence imposed upon revocation of his supervised release.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Rodriguez in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 24, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8624397 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →