Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8624399
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Villanueva v. Lewis
No. 8624399 · Decided August 24, 2006
No. 8624399·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 24, 2006
Citation
No. 8624399
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** California state prisoner Eric Scott Villanueva appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 , and we affirm. Villanueva contends that he was deprived of his Sixth Amendment right to a fair and impartial jury due to juror misconduct. We conclude that the state court’s decision on this matter was neither contrary to nor an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court. See McDonough Power Equip., Inc. v. Greenwood, 464 U.S. 548, 556 , 104 S.Ct. 845 , 78 L.Ed.2d 663 (1984); Fields v. Brown, 431 F.3d 1186, 1193-98 (9th Cir.2005). Furthermore, we reject Villanueva’s contention that the hearing conducted on his motion for a new trial violated his right to due process. See Dyer v. Calderon, 151 F.3d 970, 976 (9th Cir.1998) (en banc). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** California state prisoner Eric Scott Villanueva appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** California state prisoner Eric Scott Villanueva appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C.
02Villanueva contends that he was deprived of his Sixth Amendment right to a fair and impartial jury due to juror misconduct.
03We conclude that the state court’s decision on this matter was neither contrary to nor an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court.
04Furthermore, we reject Villanueva’s contention that the hearing conducted on his motion for a new trial violated his right to due process.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** California state prisoner Eric Scott Villanueva appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Villanueva v. Lewis in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 24, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8624399 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.