Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8692206
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Nguyen
No. 8692206 · Decided May 13, 2014
No. 8692206·Ninth Circuit · 2014·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
May 13, 2014
Citation
No. 8692206
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Richard V. Nguyen appeals from the revocation of supervised release and 12-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Nguyen’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Nguyen the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
Nguyen appeals from the revocation of supervised release and 12-month sentence imposed upon revocation.
Key Points
01Nguyen appeals from the revocation of supervised release and 12-month sentence imposed upon revocation.
021396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Nguyen’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.
03We have provided Nguyen the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief.
04No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Nguyen appeals from the revocation of supervised release and 12-month sentence imposed upon revocation.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Nguyen in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 13, 2014.
Use the citation No. 8692206 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.