FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8692222
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

United States v. White

No. 8692222 · Decided May 13, 2014
No. 8692222 · Ninth Circuit · 2014 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
May 13, 2014
Citation
No. 8692222
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Jacqueline Michelle White appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges her guilty-plea conviction and 37-month sentence for possession with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1) and (b)(1)(C). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), White’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided White the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Jacqueline Michelle White appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges her guilty-plea conviction and 37-month sentence for possession with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Jacqueline Michelle White appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges her guilty-plea conviction and 37-month sentence for possession with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. White in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 13, 2014.
Use the citation No. 8692222 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →