United States v. Landazuri-Encinas

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 2 2024 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-3298 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 4:17-cr-00691-JGZ-AMM-1 v. MEMORANDUM* LUIS ONORIO LANDAZURI- ENCINAS, AKA Luis Honorio Landazuri- Encinas, AKA Luis Encinas-Lanzurei, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Jennifer G. Zipps, District Judge, Presiding Submitted November 20, 2024** Before: CANBY, TALLMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges. Luis Onorio Landazuri-Encinas appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking supervised release and imposing a 24-month sentence. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Landazuri-Encinas’s counsel has filed a * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.1 Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. AFFIRMED. 1 The court was unable to notify Landazuri-Encinas of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief because his whereabouts are unknown; both the government and Landazuri-Encinas’s counsel informed the court that he is not in federal custody and his location is unknown. 2 24-3298