Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 9412468
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Jose Plaza, Jr.
No. 9412468 · Decided July 10, 2023
No. 9412468·Ninth Circuit · 2023·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
July 10, 2023
Citation
No. 9412468
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 10 2023
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-10009
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
D.C. No. 4:21-cr-03296-SHR-EJM-1
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
MEMORANDUM*
JOSE LUIS PLAZA, Jr.,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Scott H. Rash, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 26, 2023**
Before: CANBY, S.R. THOMAS, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Jose Luis Plaza, Jr. appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges
his guilty-plea conviction and 60-month sentence for smuggling goods from the
United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 554(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), Plaza’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have
provided Plaza the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se
supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal as to
Plaza’s conviction, 60-month custodial sentence, and 3-year term of supervised
release. Concerning the conditions of Plaza’s supervised release, we find no
arguable issues except as to special conditions 1 and 4, which involve an
unconstitutional delegation of authority under United States v. Nishida, 53 F.4th
1144, 1151-55 (9th Cir. 2022). We accordingly vacate those conditions and
remand for the district court to modify them in a manner consistent with Nishida.
As to all other issues, we affirm.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED in part; VACATED in part; and REMANDED with
instructions.
2 23-10009
Plain English Summary
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 10 2023 MOLLY C.
Key Points
01NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 10 2023 MOLLY C.
02Rash, District Judge, Presiding Submitted June 26, 2023** Before: CANBY, S.R.
03appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 60-month sentence for smuggling goods from the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
04738 (1967), Plaza’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Frequently Asked Questions
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 10 2023 MOLLY C.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for United States v. Jose Plaza, Jr. in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 10, 2023.
Use the citation No. 9412468 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.