United States v. Jonathan Oliver

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 10 2023 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-30010 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 9:13-cr-00034-DWM-1 v. MEMORANDUM* JONATHAN LEE OLIVER, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Donald W. Molloy, District Judge, Presiding Submitted June 26, 2023** Before: CANBY, S.R. THOMAS, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. Jonathan Lee Oliver appeals from the district court’s judgment revoking supervised release and imposing a sentence of 45 days, plus 32 months of supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Oliver’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. * The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. AFFIRMED. 2 23-30010