Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8699809
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Tate v. Family Auto Group, Inc.
No. 8699809 · Decided July 10, 2017
No. 8699809·Ninth Circuit · 2017·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
July 10, 2017
Citation
No. 8699809
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** We vacate the district court’s dismissal of this action, and we remand for reconsideration in light of Karczewski v. DCH Mission Valley, LLC, No. 15-55633. VACATED and REMANDED. Costs on appeal awarded to Plaintiff. BYBEE, Circuit Judge, acquiescing dubitante: I acquiesce dubitante for the reasons articulated in my separate opinion in Karczewski v. DCH Mission Valley, LLC, No. 15-55633. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** We vacate the district court’s dismissal of this action, and we remand for reconsideration in light of Karczewski v.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** We vacate the district court’s dismissal of this action, and we remand for reconsideration in light of Karczewski v.
02BYBEE, Circuit Judge, acquiescing dubitante: I acquiesce dubitante for the reasons articulated in my separate opinion in Karczewski v.
03This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
04
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** We vacate the district court’s dismissal of this action, and we remand for reconsideration in light of Karczewski v.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Tate v. Family Auto Group, Inc. in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 10, 2017.
Use the citation No. 8699809 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.