Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8699811
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Schutza v. FRN of San Diego, LLC
No. 8699811 · Decided July 10, 2017
No. 8699811·Ninth Circuit · 2017·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
July 10, 2017
Citation
No. 8699811
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** We vacate the district court’s dismissal of this action, and we remand for reconsid *627 eration in light of Karczewski v. DCH Mission Valley, LLC, No. 15-55633. VACATED and REMANDED. Costs on appeal awarded to Plaintiff. BYBEE, Circuit Judge, acquiescing dubitante: I acquiesce dubitante for the reasons articulated in my separate opinion in Karczewski v. DCH Mission Valley, LLC, No. 15-55633. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** We vacate the district court’s dismissal of this action, and we remand for reconsid *627 eration in light of Karczewski v.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** We vacate the district court’s dismissal of this action, and we remand for reconsid *627 eration in light of Karczewski v.
02BYBEE, Circuit Judge, acquiescing dubitante: I acquiesce dubitante for the reasons articulated in my separate opinion in Karczewski v.
03This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
04
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** We vacate the district court’s dismissal of this action, and we remand for reconsid *627 eration in light of Karczewski v.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Schutza v. FRN of San Diego, LLC in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 10, 2017.
Use the citation No. 8699811 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.