Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8623621
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Sintuj-Vasquez v. Gonzales
No. 8623621 · Decided July 28, 2006
No. 8623621·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
July 28, 2006
Citation
No. 8623621
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Conrado Adolfo Sintuj-Vasquez and Lilian Del Carmen Catalan, husband and wife, and natives and citizens of Guatemala, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their applications for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review. The petitioners’ contention that the agency deprived them of due process by finding that they failed to establish exceptional and extremely unusual hardship does not state a colorable due process claim. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005) (“[traditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute colorable constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Conrado Adolfo Sintuj-Vasquez and Lilian Del Carmen Catalan, husband and wife, and natives and citizens of Guatemala, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from an immigration j
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Conrado Adolfo Sintuj-Vasquez and Lilian Del Carmen Catalan, husband and wife, and natives and citizens of Guatemala, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from an immigration j
02The petitioners’ contention that the agency deprived them of due process by finding that they failed to establish exceptional and extremely unusual hardship does not state a colorable due process claim.
03Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005) (“[traditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute colorable constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”).
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Conrado Adolfo Sintuj-Vasquez and Lilian Del Carmen Catalan, husband and wife, and natives and citizens of Guatemala, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from an immigration j
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Sintuj-Vasquez v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 28, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8623621 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.