Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8623622
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Arellano v. Gonzales
No. 8623622 · Decided July 28, 2006
No. 8623622·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
July 28, 2006
Citation
No. 8623622
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Luis Manuel Reyes Arellano, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an immigration judge’s (“U”) decision denying his application for cancellation of removal and denying a continuance. We dismiss the petition for review. We lack jurisdiction to review Reyes Arellano’s contention that the I J’s denial of a continuance deprived him of due process because he failed to raise that issue before the BIA and thereby failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004) (noting that due process challenges that are “procedural in nature” must be exhausted). Reyes Arellano’s motion for submission of the case without oral argument is denied as moot. PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Luis Manuel Reyes Arellano, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an immigration judge’s (“U”) decision denying his application for cancellation of re
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Luis Manuel Reyes Arellano, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an immigration judge’s (“U”) decision denying his application for cancellation of re
02We lack jurisdiction to review Reyes Arellano’s contention that the I J’s denial of a continuance deprived him of due process because he failed to raise that issue before the BIA and thereby failed to exhaust his administrative remedies.
03Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004) (noting that due process challenges that are “procedural in nature” must be exhausted).
04Reyes Arellano’s motion for submission of the case without oral argument is denied as moot.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Luis Manuel Reyes Arellano, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an immigration judge’s (“U”) decision denying his application for cancellation of re
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Arellano v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 28, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8623622 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.