Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8625760
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Singh v. Gonzales
No. 8625760 · Decided November 9, 2006
No. 8625760·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
November 9, 2006
Citation
No. 8625760
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM *** Amarjit Singh petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s dismissal of his asylum, withholding of removal, and Convention Against Torture claims. The immigration judge pretermitted Singh’s asylum claim as untimely without exceptional circumstances and denied his withholding of removal and Convention Against Torture claims as not credible. The Board of Immigration Appeals adopted the immigration judge’s finding of facts, affirmed the immigration judge’s decision, and dismissed Singh’s appeal. This court lacks jurisdiction to review the Board of Immigration Appeals’s dismissal of an appeal of an asylum application as untimely without exceptional circumstances, 1 and sufficient evidence supports the immigration judge’s adverse credibility determination. The petition is DENIED. xhiS disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. . 8U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3).
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM *** Amarjit Singh petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s dismissal of his asylum, withholding of removal, and Convention Against Torture claims.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM *** Amarjit Singh petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s dismissal of his asylum, withholding of removal, and Convention Against Torture claims.
02The immigration judge pretermitted Singh’s asylum claim as untimely without exceptional circumstances and denied his withholding of removal and Convention Against Torture claims as not credible.
03The Board of Immigration Appeals adopted the immigration judge’s finding of facts, affirmed the immigration judge’s decision, and dismissed Singh’s appeal.
04This court lacks jurisdiction to review the Board of Immigration Appeals’s dismissal of an appeal of an asylum application as untimely without exceptional circumstances, 1 and sufficient evidence supports the immigration judge’s adverse cre
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM *** Amarjit Singh petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s dismissal of his asylum, withholding of removal, and Convention Against Torture claims.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Singh v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on November 9, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8625760 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.