FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8625762
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Mijares v. Gonzales

No. 8625762 · Decided November 9, 2006
No. 8625762 · Ninth Circuit · 2006 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
November 9, 2006
Citation
No. 8625762
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Robert Zayco Mijares and Joelie Ortiz Mijares, natives and citizens of the Philippines, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their third motion to reopen deportation proceedings as both time- and number-barred under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 . We dismiss the petition for review. The Mijares’ sole contention is that the BIA abused its discretion by not explicitly stating that it declined to invoke its sua sponte authority to reopen proceedings. We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision “whether to invoke its sua sponte authority” because the decision “is committed to its unfettered discretion.” Abassi v. INS, 305 F.3d 1028, 1032 (9th Cir.2002) (internal quotation marks omitted). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Robert Zayco Mijares and Joelie Ortiz Mijares, natives and citizens of the Philippines, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their third motion to reopen deportation proceedings as bot
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Robert Zayco Mijares and Joelie Ortiz Mijares, natives and citizens of the Philippines, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their third motion to reopen deportation proceedings as bot
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Mijares v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on November 9, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8625762 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →