Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8622888
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Santoyo-Prado v. Gonzales
No. 8622888 · Decided July 21, 2006
No. 8622888·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
July 21, 2006
Citation
No. 8622888
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of an order denying petitioner’s application for cancellation of removal. We have reviewed peti *683 tioner’s response to the court’s February 27, 2006 order to show cause, and we conclude that this petition for review is appropriate for summary disposition. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(d)(l) (“... any period of continuous residence or continuous physical presence in the United States shall be deemed to end ... when the alien is served a notice to appear ... ”); Garcia-Ramirez v. Gonzales, 423 F.3d 935 , 937 n. 3 (9th Cir.2005) (per curiam) (stating accrual of physical presence time ends when removal proceedings are commenced through service of a notice to appear); United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard for summary disposition). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of an order denying petitioner’s application for cancellation of removal.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of an order denying petitioner’s application for cancellation of removal.
02We have reviewed peti *683 tioner’s response to the court’s February 27, 2006 order to show cause, and we conclude that this petition for review is appropriate for summary disposition.
03any period of continuous residence or continuous physical presence in the United States shall be deemed to end ...
043 (9th Cir.2005) (per curiam) (stating accrual of physical presence time ends when removal proceedings are commenced through service of a notice to appear); United States v.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** This is a petition for review of an order denying petitioner’s application for cancellation of removal.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Santoyo-Prado v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 21, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8622888 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.