Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8622890
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Medina-Perez v. Gonzales
No. 8622890 · Decided July 21, 2006
No. 8622890·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
July 21, 2006
Citation
No. 8622890
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s motion for summary disposition with respect to the denial of the motion to reconsider is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United *686 States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Respondent’s motion to dismiss this petition for review for lack of jurisdiction with respect to the denial of the motion to reopen is granted. See Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 592 (9th Cir.2006). All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal and voluntary departure confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) and Desta v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004), shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED IN PART, DISMISSED IN PART. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s motion for summary disposition with respect to the denial of the motion to reconsider is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s motion for summary disposition with respect to the denial of the motion to reconsider is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
03Respondent’s motion to dismiss this petition for review for lack of jurisdiction with respect to the denial of the motion to reopen is granted.
04The temporary stay of removal and voluntary departure confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) and Desta v.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s motion for summary disposition with respect to the denial of the motion to reconsider is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Medina-Perez v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on July 21, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8622890 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.