Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8621853
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Mills v. City of Phoenix
No. 8621853 · Decided June 9, 2006
No. 8621853·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
June 9, 2006
Citation
No. 8621853
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
*692 MEMORANDUM ** A review of the record and the response to the court’s April 14, 2006 order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment. All pending motions are denied as moot. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
*692 MEMORANDUM ** A review of the record and the response to the court’s April 14, 2006 order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
Key Points
01*692 MEMORANDUM ** A review of the record and the response to the court’s April 14, 2006 order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
03Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
*692 MEMORANDUM ** A review of the record and the response to the court’s April 14, 2006 order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Mills v. City of Phoenix in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on June 9, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8621853 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.