Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8621855
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Ellis v. Kessner Duca Umebayashi Bain & Matsunaga
No. 8621855 · Decided June 9, 2006
No. 8621855·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
June 9, 2006
Citation
No. 8621855
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** We have reviewed appellant’s response to the order to show cause. This appeal is barred by the doctrine of res judicata. See Tahoe-Sierra Pres. Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Rg’l Planning Agency, 322 F.3d 1064, 1077 (9th Cir.2003). AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** We have reviewed appellant’s response to the order to show cause.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** We have reviewed appellant’s response to the order to show cause.