Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8653673
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Maciel v. Mukasey
No. 8653673 · Decided March 24, 2008
No. 8653673·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
March 24, 2008
Citation
No. 8653673
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Claudia Annette Garcia Maciel, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review from a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings. Maciel sought cancellation of removal *569 based on hardship to her United States citizen children. We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s denial of petitioner’s motion to reopen, which alleged that her children would suffer hardship if she was removed. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(2)(B)(i); Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 592, 600 (9th Cir.2006) (concluding that this court lacks jurisdiction to review the BIA’s denial of motion to reopen for failure to establish a prima facie case if a prior adverse discretionary decision was made by the agency). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Claudia Annette Garcia Maciel, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review from a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Claudia Annette Garcia Maciel, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review from a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings.
02Maciel sought cancellation of removal *569 based on hardship to her United States citizen children.
03We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s denial of petitioner’s motion to reopen, which alleged that her children would suffer hardship if she was removed.
04Gonzales, 439 F.3d 592, 600 (9th Cir.2006) (concluding that this court lacks jurisdiction to review the BIA’s denial of motion to reopen for failure to establish a prima facie case if a prior adverse discretionary decision was made by the a
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Claudia Annette Garcia Maciel, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review from a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying her motion to reopen removal proceedings.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Maciel v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 24, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8653673 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.