Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8623815
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jeronimo v. Gonzales
No. 8623815 · Decided August 1, 2006
No. 8623815·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 1, 2006
Citation
No. 8623815
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Javier Rodrigo Martinez Jeronimo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We dismiss the petition for review. The evidence Jeronimo presented with his motion to reopen concerned the same basic hardship grounds as his application for cancellation of removal. See Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 592, 602-03 (9th Cir.2006). We therefore lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s determination that the evidence would not alter its prior discretionary determination that he failed to establish the requisite hardship. See id. at 600 (holding that 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(2)(B)(i) bars this court from reviewing the denial of a motion to reopen where “the only question presented is whether [the] new evidence altered the prior, underlying discretionary determination that [the petitioner] had not met the hardship standard.”) (Internal quotations and brackets omitted). *635 PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Javier Rodrigo Martinez Jeronimo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Javier Rodrigo Martinez Jeronimo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings.
02The evidence Jeronimo presented with his motion to reopen concerned the same basic hardship grounds as his application for cancellation of removal.
03We therefore lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s determination that the evidence would not alter its prior discretionary determination that he failed to establish the requisite hardship.
04§ 1252 (a)(2)(B)(i) bars this court from reviewing the denial of a motion to reopen where “the only question presented is whether [the] new evidence altered the prior, underlying discretionary determination that [the petitioner] had not met
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Javier Rodrigo Martinez Jeronimo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Jeronimo v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 1, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8623815 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.