FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8623814
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Gutierrez v. Gonzales

No. 8623814 · Decided August 1, 2006
No. 8623814 · Ninth Circuit · 2006 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 1, 2006
Citation
No. 8623814
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Ana E. Rodriguez Gutierrez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to *634 reconsider its order denying her application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider, see Oh v. Gonzales, 406 F.3d 611, 612 (9th Cir.2005), and we deny the petition for review. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner’s motion to reconsider as untimely because petitioner filed the motion nearly eighteen months after the BIA’s underlying decision. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (b)(2) (stating that a motion to reconsider must be filed with the Board within 30 days after the mailing of the Board’s decision). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
Rodriguez Gutierrez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to *634 reconsider its order denying her application for cancellation of removal.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
Rodriguez Gutierrez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to *634 reconsider its order denying her application for cancellation of removal.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Gutierrez v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 1, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8623814 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →