Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8621501
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Gonzalez Oregon v. Gonzales
No. 8621501 · Decided May 19, 2006
No. 8621501·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
May 19, 2006
Citation
No. 8621501
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Armando Gonzalez Oregon, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We dismiss the petition for review. We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary denial of cancellation of removal for failure to satisfy the “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” requirement. See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir.2003). Gonzales Oregon’s contention that his due process rights were violated because the IJ ignored a doctor’s letter concerning his son’s medical condition is not supported by the record and therefore does not raise a colorable due process challenge. See Torres-Aguilar v. INS, 246 F.3d 1267, 1271 (9th Cir.2001). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Armando Gonzalez Oregon, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for cancellation of remo
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Armando Gonzalez Oregon, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for cancellation of remo
02We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary denial of cancellation of removal for failure to satisfy the “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” requirement.
03Gonzales Oregon’s contention that his due process rights were violated because the IJ ignored a doctor’s letter concerning his son’s medical condition is not supported by the record and therefore does not raise a colorable due process chall
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Armando Gonzalez Oregon, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for cancellation of remo
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Gonzalez Oregon v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 19, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8621501 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.