Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8621502
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Alonzo-Cruz v. Gonzales
No. 8621502 · Decided May 19, 2006
No. 8621502·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
May 19, 2006
Citation
No. 8621502
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** *662 J. Inocente Alonzo-Cruz and Tomasa Pena de Alonzo, husband and wife and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their applications for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We dismiss the petition for review. Petitioners’ contention that they met the “good moral character” and continuous physical presence requirements for cancellation of removal is unavailing because the Id’s decision was based solely on a finding that they had not demonstrated the requisite degree of hardship. See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 889 (9th Cir.2003) (listing statutory requirements for relief). We lack jurisdiction to review that discretionary determination. See id. at 891-92 . PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
Inocente Alonzo-Cruz and Tomasa Pena de Alonzo, husband and wife and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their app
Key Points
01Inocente Alonzo-Cruz and Tomasa Pena de Alonzo, husband and wife and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their app
02Petitioners’ contention that they met the “good moral character” and continuous physical presence requirements for cancellation of removal is unavailing because the Id’s decision was based solely on a finding that they had not demonstrated
04We lack jurisdiction to review that discretionary determination.
Frequently Asked Questions
Inocente Alonzo-Cruz and Tomasa Pena de Alonzo, husband and wife and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their app
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Alonzo-Cruz v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 19, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8621502 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.