Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8630053
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Estrada v. Gonzales
No. 8630053 · Decided April 9, 2007
No. 8630053·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
April 9, 2007
Citation
No. 8630053
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Petitioner seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision, dated August 30, 2006, denying petitioner’s fifth motion to reopen as numerically barred. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (c)(2). The regulations provide that “a party may file only one motion to reopen.... ” See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (c)(2). Therefore, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner’s fifth motion to reopen. See id., see also Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 895-96 (9th Cir.2003). Petitioner has failed to identify any issue sufficiently substantial to warrant further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Petitioner seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision, dated August 30, 2006, denying petitioner’s fifth motion to reopen as numerically barred.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Petitioner seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision, dated August 30, 2006, denying petitioner’s fifth motion to reopen as numerically barred.
02The regulations provide that “a party may file only one motion to reopen....
03Therefore, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner’s fifth motion to reopen.
04Petitioner has failed to identify any issue sufficiently substantial to warrant further argument.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Petitioner seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision, dated August 30, 2006, denying petitioner’s fifth motion to reopen as numerically barred.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Estrada v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 9, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8630053 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.