Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8630054
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Aguilar v. Gonzales
No. 8630054 · Decided April 9, 2007
No. 8630054·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
April 9, 2007
Citation
No. 8630054
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
*625 MEMORANDUM ** Petitioner seeks review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals, dated September 29, 2006, denying petitioner’s second motion to reconsider as numerically barred pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (b)(2). Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied. Ml other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate. To the extent petitioner requests a stay of voluntary departure, this court lacks jurisdiction to grant that request. See Garcia v. Ashcroft, 368 F.3d 1157 (9th Cir.2004). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
*625 MEMORANDUM ** Petitioner seeks review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals, dated September 29, 2006, denying petitioner’s second motion to reconsider as numerically barred pursuant to 8 C.F.R.
Key Points
01*625 MEMORANDUM ** Petitioner seeks review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals, dated September 29, 2006, denying petitioner’s second motion to reconsider as numerically barred pursuant to 8 C.F.R.
02Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
04The temporary stay of removal confirmed by Ninth Circuit General Order 6.4(c) shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.
Frequently Asked Questions
*625 MEMORANDUM ** Petitioner seeks review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals, dated September 29, 2006, denying petitioner’s second motion to reconsider as numerically barred pursuant to 8 C.F.R.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Aguilar v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 9, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8630054 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.