FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8648277
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Esteban v. Mukasey

No. 8648277 · Decided March 11, 2008
No. 8648277 · Ninth Circuit · 2008 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
March 11, 2008
Citation
No. 8648277
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Jaime Juan Esteban, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen proceedings to reissue its decision affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . Reviewing for abuse of discretion, Lara-Torres v. Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 968, 972 (9th Cir.2004), we grant the petition and remand for further proceedings. The BIA abused its discretion by failing to address the affidavit of Esteban’s counsel which stated that neither he nor Esteban received the BIA’s order affirming the IJ’s denial of relief. See Singh v. Gonzales, 494 F.3d 1170, 1172 (9th Cir.2007) (presumption of proper mailing created by transmittal cover letter may be overcome by evidence of non-receipt by a petitioner or his counsel). We remand for the BIA *695 to review the rebuttal evidence in the first instance and to determine whether it is sufficient to overcome the presumption of delivery. PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Jaime Juan Esteban, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen proceedings to reissue its decision affirming an immigration judge’s (
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Jaime Juan Esteban, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen proceedings to reissue its decision affirming an immigration judge’s (
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Esteban v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 11, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8648277 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →