Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8648279
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jiajun Yuan v. Mukasey
No. 8648279 · Decided March 11, 2008
No. 8648279·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
March 11, 2008
Citation
No. 8648279
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Jiajun Yuan, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen proceedings to reissue its prior decision. To the extent we have jurisdiction, it is pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review. In his opening brief, Yuan fails to address, and thereby waives any challenge to, the BIA’s grounds for denying his motion to reopen. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir.1996) (holding that issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived). We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s underlying order dismissing Yuan’s appeal from the immigration judge’s decision to deny asylum and withholding of removal because this petition for review is not timely as to that order. See Membreno v. Gonzales, 425 F.3d 1227, 1229 (9th Cir. 2005). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Jiajun Yuan, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen proceedings to reissue its prior decision.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Jiajun Yuan, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen proceedings to reissue its prior decision.
02To the extent we have jurisdiction, it is pursuant to 8 U.S.C.
03We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.
04In his opening brief, Yuan fails to address, and thereby waives any challenge to, the BIA’s grounds for denying his motion to reopen.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Jiajun Yuan, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen proceedings to reissue its prior decision.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Jiajun Yuan v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on March 11, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8648279 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.