Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8647765
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Epinosa v. Marshall
No. 8647765 · Decided February 15, 2008
No. 8647765·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
February 15, 2008
Citation
No. 8647765
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** This is an appeal from the district court’s June 14, 2007 order dismissing appellant’s complaint with prejudice. Appellees’ request for judicial notice is granted. *565 We have received and reviewed “Appellant’s Compliance with Order November 16, 2007 Re; [sic] Order to Show Cause”, as well as appellees’ response and appellant’s reply. A review of the record, the opening brief, and the responses to the order to show cause indicate that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment. All pending motions are denied as moot. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** This is an appeal from the district court’s June 14, 2007 order dismissing appellant’s complaint with prejudice.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** This is an appeal from the district court’s June 14, 2007 order dismissing appellant’s complaint with prejudice.
02*565 We have received and reviewed “Appellant’s Compliance with Order November 16, 2007 Re; [sic] Order to Show Cause”, as well as appellees’ response and appellant’s reply.
03A review of the record, the opening brief, and the responses to the order to show cause indicate that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.