Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8647764
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Bird v. Lamalfa
No. 8647764 · Decided February 15, 2008
No. 8647764·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
February 15, 2008
Citation
No. 8647764
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Appellant Donald M. Bird appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing his case for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. This court reviews the district court’s order de novo, and we affirm. See Gibson v. United States, 781 F.2d 1334, 1337 (9th Cir.1986). Our review of the record, appellant’s opening brief, and response to this court’s order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment. To the extent appellant requests that the court issue a writ of mandamus, that request is denied. All other pending motions are denied as moot. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
Bird appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing his case for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
Key Points
01Bird appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing his case for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
02This court reviews the district court’s order de novo, and we affirm.
03Our review of the record, appellant’s opening brief, and response to this court’s order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.