Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8621857
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Connelly v. City of Reno
No. 8621857 · Decided June 9, 2006
No. 8621857·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
June 9, 2006
Citation
No. 8621857
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** We have received notice of appellant’s payment of the docketing and filing fees for this appeal. A review of the record and appellant’s response to the court’s order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment. All pending motions are denied as moot. AFFIRMED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** We have received notice of appellant’s payment of the docketing and filing fees for this appeal.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** We have received notice of appellant’s payment of the docketing and filing fees for this appeal.
02A review of the record and appellant’s response to the court’s order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.