Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8621851
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Elizarov v. Gonzales
No. 8621851 · Decided June 9, 2006
No. 8621851·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
June 9, 2006
Citation
No. 8621851
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (c)(2) (a “motion to reopen deportation ... proceedings ... must be filed no later than 90 days after the date on which the final administrative decision was rendered in the proceeding sought to be reopened, or on or before September 30, 1996, whichever is later”); United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Petitioner’s reliance on the initial panel order in Velezmoro v. Ashcroft, is misplaced. That panel order was vacated by the en banc court on January 18, 2005 in an unpublished memorandum disposition. Velezmoro v. Ashcroft, *690 120 Fed.Appx. 185 (9th Cir.2005). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
02must be filed no later than 90 days after the date on which the final administrative decision was rendered in the proceeding sought to be reopened, or on or before September 30, 1996, whichever is later”); United States v.
04Petitioner’s reliance on the initial panel order in Velezmoro v.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Elizarov v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on June 9, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8621851 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.