Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8642491
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Diaz v. Gonzales
No. 8642491 · Decided August 23, 2007
No. 8642491·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 23, 2007
Citation
No. 8642491
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Leonardo A. Diaz and Maria Guadalupe Osegueda De Diaz, husband and wife and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order denying their motion to reopen the BIA’s order summarily affirming the immigration judge’s denial of their application for cancellation of removal, based on their failure to establish exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to their United States citizen children. In the motion to reopen, petitioners presented additional evidence of their United States citizen daughter Jocelyn’s emotional and educational difficulties. The evidence petitioners presented with their motion to reopen concerned the same basic hardship grounds as their application for cancellation of removal. We therefore lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s discretionary determination that the evidence was insufficient to establish a prima facie case of hardship. See Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 592, 601-03 (9th Cir.2006). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
Diaz and Maria Guadalupe Osegueda De Diaz, husband and wife and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order denying their motion to reopen the BIA’s order summarily affirming the immigratio
Key Points
01Diaz and Maria Guadalupe Osegueda De Diaz, husband and wife and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order denying their motion to reopen the BIA’s order summarily affirming the immigratio
02In the motion to reopen, petitioners presented additional evidence of their United States citizen daughter Jocelyn’s emotional and educational difficulties.
03The evidence petitioners presented with their motion to reopen concerned the same basic hardship grounds as their application for cancellation of removal.
04We therefore lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s discretionary determination that the evidence was insufficient to establish a prima facie case of hardship.
Frequently Asked Questions
Diaz and Maria Guadalupe Osegueda De Diaz, husband and wife and natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order denying their motion to reopen the BIA’s order summarily affirming the immigratio
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Diaz v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 23, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8642491 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.