Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8642492
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Bravo v. Gonzales
No. 8642492 · Decided August 23, 2007
No. 8642492·Ninth Circuit · 2007·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 23, 2007
Citation
No. 8642492
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Maria Marron-De Bravo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of *659 the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an immigration judge’s decision denying her motion to terminate proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We deny the petition for review. Marron-De Bravo’s contention that the agency erred by not requiring the government to take reasonable steps to produce the preparer of the 1-213 for cross-examination fails because she did not provide probative evidence casting doubt on the reliability of the 1-213. See Espinoza v. INS, 45 F.3d 308, 311 (9th Cir.1995) (concluding that alien is not entitled to cross-examine preparer of 1-213 when preparer was INS agent and no evidence contradicted the challenged hearsay). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Maria Marron-De Bravo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of *659 the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an immigration judge’s decision denying her motion to terminate proceedings.
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Maria Marron-De Bravo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of *659 the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an immigration judge’s decision denying her motion to terminate proceedings.
02Marron-De Bravo’s contention that the agency erred by not requiring the government to take reasonable steps to produce the preparer of the 1-213 for cross-examination fails because she did not provide probative evidence casting doubt on the
03INS, 45 F.3d 308, 311 (9th Cir.1995) (concluding that alien is not entitled to cross-examine preparer of 1-213 when preparer was INS agent and no evidence contradicted the challenged hearsay).
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Maria Marron-De Bravo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of *659 the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an immigration judge’s decision denying her motion to terminate proceedings.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Bravo v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 23, 2007.
Use the citation No. 8642492 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.