Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8623879
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Diaz-Diaz v. Gonzales
No. 8623879 · Decided August 2, 2006
No. 8623879·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 2, 2006
Citation
No. 8623879
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Candido Diaz-Diaz, and his wife Elvia Diaz, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their applications for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review. The petitioners’ contentions that the BIA and IJ violated their due process rights by acting arbitrarily, departing from procedure, and disregarding their evidence, are not supported by the record and do not amount to colorable constitutional claims. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005) (“[tjraditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute colorable constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Candido Diaz-Diaz, and his wife Elvia Diaz, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision deny
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Candido Diaz-Diaz, and his wife Elvia Diaz, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision deny
02The petitioners’ contentions that the BIA and IJ violated their due process rights by acting arbitrarily, departing from procedure, and disregarding their evidence, are not supported by the record and do not amount to colorable constitution
03Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005) (“[tjraditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute colorable constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”).
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Candido Diaz-Diaz, and his wife Elvia Diaz, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision deny
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Diaz-Diaz v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 2, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8623879 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.