Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8623881
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Hernandez v. Gonzales
No. 8623881 · Decided August 2, 2006
No. 8623881·Ninth Circuit · 2006·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
August 2, 2006
Citation
No. 8623881
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Ana Bertha Acosta Hernandez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ *702 (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review de novo claims of due process violations in immigration proceedings. See Sanchez-Cruz v. INS, 255 F.3d 775, 779 (9th Cir.2001). We deny the petition for review. We reject Hernandez’s contention that the IJ violated due process by refusing to consider a report detailing the cost of treating asthma in Mexico because Hernandez failed to demonstrate that additional evidence would have affected the outcome of the proceedings. See Colmenar v. INS, 210 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir.2000) (citation omitted) (requiring prejudice to prevail on a due process challenge). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Ana Bertha Acosta Hernandez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ *702 (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for c
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Ana Bertha Acosta Hernandez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ *702 (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for c
02We review de novo claims of due process violations in immigration proceedings.
03We reject Hernandez’s contention that the IJ violated due process by refusing to consider a report detailing the cost of treating asthma in Mexico because Hernandez failed to demonstrate that additional evidence would have affected the outc
04INS, 210 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir.2000) (citation omitted) (requiring prejudice to prevail on a due process challenge).
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Ana Bertha Acosta Hernandez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ *702 (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her application for c
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Hernandez v. Gonzales in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on August 2, 2006.
Use the citation No. 8623881 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.