Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10381979
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
City of Huntington Beach v. Newsom
No. 10381979 · Decided April 21, 2025
No. 10381979·Ninth Circuit · 2025·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
April 21, 2025
Citation
No. 10381979
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, No. 23-3694
a California Charter City and
D.C. No.
Municipal Corporation;
8:23-cv-00421-
HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY
FWS-ADS
COUNCIL; TONY STRICKLAND,
Mayor of Huntington Beach;
GRACEY VAN DER MARK, Mayor ORDER
Pro Tem of Huntington Beach,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
GAVIN NEWSOM, individually and
in his official capacity as Governor of
the State of California; GUSTAVO
VELASQUEZ, in his official
capacity as Director of the State of
California Department of Housing
and Community Development;
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
HOUSING AND COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT; DOES, 1-50,
inclusive; SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF
GOVERNMENT,
Defendants – Appellees.
2 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH V. NEWSOM
Filed April 21, 2025
Before: Richard C. Tallman, Ryan D. Nelson, and Daniel
A. Bress, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Judge R. Nelson and Judge Bress voted to deny the
petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Tallman recommended
denying the petition for rehearing en banc.
The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing
en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the
matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of
the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc
consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 40.
The petition for rehearing en banc, Dkt. 54, is DENIED.
Plain English Summary
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, No.
Key Points
01FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, No.
02Municipal Corporation; 8:23-cv-00421- HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY FWS-ADS COUNCIL; TONY STRICKLAND, Mayor of Huntington Beach; GRACEY VAN DER MARK, Mayor ORDER Pro Tem of Huntington Beach, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v.
03GAVIN NEWSOM, individually and in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California; GUSTAVO VELASQUEZ, in his official capacity as Director of the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development; CALIFORNIA D
04Nelson and Judge Bress voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc.
Frequently Asked Questions
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for City of Huntington Beach v. Newsom in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 21, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10381979 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.