FlawCheck Citator
Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 10381979
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

City of Huntington Beach v. Newsom

No. 10381979 · Decided April 21, 2025
No. 10381979 · Ninth Circuit · 2025 · FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
April 21, 2025
Citation
No. 10381979
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, No. 23-3694 a California Charter City and D.C. No. Municipal Corporation; 8:23-cv-00421- HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY FWS-ADS COUNCIL; TONY STRICKLAND, Mayor of Huntington Beach; GRACEY VAN DER MARK, Mayor ORDER Pro Tem of Huntington Beach, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. GAVIN NEWSOM, individually and in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California; GUSTAVO VELASQUEZ, in his official capacity as Director of the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development; CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT; DOES, 1-50, inclusive; SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENT, Defendants – Appellees. 2 CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH V. NEWSOM Filed April 21, 2025 Before: Richard C. Tallman, Ryan D. Nelson, and Daniel A. Bress, Circuit Judges. ORDER Judge R. Nelson and Judge Bress voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Tallman recommended denying the petition for rehearing en banc. The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 40. The petition for rehearing en banc, Dkt. 54, is DENIED.
Plain English Summary
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, No.
Key Points
Frequently Asked Questions
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, No.
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for City of Huntington Beach v. Newsom in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on April 21, 2025.
Use the citation No. 10381979 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.
Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Why Attorneys Choose FlawFinder

Side-by-side with Westlaw and LexisNexis

Feature FlawFinder Westlaw LexisNexis
Monthly price$19 – $99$133 – $646$153 – $399
ContractNone1–3 year min1–6 year min
Hidden fees$0, alwaysUp to $469/search$25/mo + per-doc
FlawCheck citatorIncludedKeyCite ($$$)Shepard's ($$$)
Plain-English summaryIncludedNoNo
CancelOne clickTermination feesAccount friction
Related Cases

Full legal research for $19/month

All 50 states · Federal regulations · Case law · Police SOPs · AI analysis included · No contract

Continue Researching →