Check how courts have cited this case. Use our free citator for the most current treatment.
No. 8670126
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Chino-Camacho v. Mukasey
No. 8670126 · Decided May 1, 2008
No. 8670126·Ninth Circuit · 2008·
FlawFinder last updated this page Apr. 2, 2026
Case Details
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
May 1, 2008
Citation
No. 8670126
Disposition
See opinion text.
Full Opinion
MEMORANDUM ** Isidro Chino-Camacho, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) or *647 der dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review. We lack jurisdiction to review Chino-Camacho’s contention that the IJ violated his due process rights by not granting his motion to continue because Chino-Camacho failed to raise this issue before the BIA. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004) (due process challenges that are “procedural in nature” must be exhausted). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Plain English Summary
MEMORANDUM ** Isidro Chino-Camacho, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) or *647 der dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for
Key Points
01MEMORANDUM ** Isidro Chino-Camacho, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) or *647 der dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for
02We lack jurisdiction to review Chino-Camacho’s contention that the IJ violated his due process rights by not granting his motion to continue because Chino-Camacho failed to raise this issue before the BIA.
03Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir.2004) (due process challenges that are “procedural in nature” must be exhausted).
04This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir.
Frequently Asked Questions
MEMORANDUM ** Isidro Chino-Camacho, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) or *647 der dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for
FlawCheck shows no negative treatment for Chino-Camacho v. Mukasey in the current circuit citation data.
This case was decided on May 1, 2008.
Use the citation No. 8670126 and verify it against the official reporter before filing.